Vector Schools

Learning intelligence for schools and departments.

Vector Schools brings StudyVector practice data into department-level views for intervention, reporting and teacher workflow support.

Request a free school trial Download schools overview

Set up inside StudyVector onboarding

Heads of department, SLT and school teams

Built inside StudyVector

This product sits under Vector Learning Technologies and uses StudyVector as the shared public platform, account path and learning context.

One learning intelligence system

Built as connected StudyVector products, not separate microsites.

One StudyVector account

One shared learning profile

Teacher, marking, school, safety and pathway planets connected to the same core

Product permissions stay under Vector Learning Technologies governance

Early-access workflow

The page is intentionally clear about status. Live, early-access and planned features are labelled so the ecosystem can grow without inventing traction or capability.

Cohort weakness tracking

Teacher dashboards

Intervention lists

Department-level reporting

Exam readiness insights

Safeguarding-aware support notes

How the workflow connects

Connect a cohort or pilot group

Review topic weaknesses and readiness signals

Create intervention groups

Export reporting notes for department and SLT review

StudyVector constellation

One account, one learning profile, multiple role-specific planets.

StudyVector

Core star

Student learning engine

Live

MarkVector

Marking planet

Teacher-reviewed feedback

Early access

TutorVector

Tutor planet

Lesson and tutor workspace

Early access

Vector Schools

School planet

Classes, homework and cohorts

Early access

SafetyVector

Safety planet

Support records and SEND-aware context

Planned

ComplianceVector

Compliance planet

Review evidence and policy records

Planned

PathwayVector

Pathway planet

Degree, apprenticeship and career guidance

Planned

StudyVectorStudent learning engine MarkVectorTeacher-reviewed feedback TutorVectorLesson and tutor workspace Vector SchoolsClasses, homework and cohorts SafetyVectorSupport records and SEND-aware context ComplianceVectorReview evidence and policy records PathwayVectorDegree, apprenticeship and career guidance

For schools, colleges and trusts

A procurement route that makes sense to HoDs, SLT, and intervention leads

The overview gives leaders a quick way to judge fit: intervention planning, class and cohort visibility, and less repetitive marking between lessons.

Request a free school trial Download school overview View evidence overview

Intervention workflow

How StudyVector maps to intervention workflows

Teacher-visible data

What class and cohort data teachers can see

Marking-time support

Where marking and follow-up time is reduced

One-page review pack

What leaders can circulate before a trial

This one-page pack explains how StudyVector fits intervention, what staff can review, and where the current product boundaries are. It is a review document, not an endorsement document.

1. How it fits intervention workflows

Assign board-aligned practice by class, cohort, topic and exam board.

2. What teachers and leaders can see

Class, cohort and topic-level accuracy for intervention follow-up.

3. Procurement and data review materials

Public security, privacy, school DPA, subprocessor and accuracy pages.

Procurement readiness

The questions a school team can answer before a pilot

Intervention fitHead of department, head of year or intervention lead
Data protection reviewDPO, data lead or operations manager
Safeguarding and responsible AIDSL, SLT or trust digital lead

Open the full school evidence overview

Pilot review rubric

How a school can judge whether the pilot is worth expanding

Agree these signals before launch so the review meeting is about evidence, not sales pressure. The decision can be to expand, refine the setup, or pause.

Usage signal

Separates product fit from rollout friction before leaders judge wider adoption.

Learning signal

Shows whether StudyVector is giving teachers actionable next steps before mocks or assessments.

Teacher workflow signal

Helps HoDs decide whether the tool reduces low-value admin while preserving professional judgement.

Access boundaries

Who can see what during a school pilot

School access should help staff intervene without turning student practice into an open dossier. We scope staff roles, pilot groups, and review needs before student personal data is shared.

Any wider rollout should confirm staff roles, retention expectations, escalation contacts, and whether student-level views are needed for the agreed intervention question.

Class teachers and HoDs

Visible

Class and assigned-student completion, topic accuracy, homework status, weak-area signals, and reviewed marking workflow where the school has set that work.

Not included by default

Private tutor conversations, parent-only messages, unrelated classes, or unrestricted exports of every answer by default.

SLT, year leads and intervention teams

Visible

Cohort, class, subject, and intervention summaries that help decide who needs follow-up and which topics need reteaching.

Not included by default

Open-ended student monitoring, social feeds, safeguarding case management, or access outside the agreed school workflow.

Students and families

Visible

Students keep their own practice account and can see the learning loop they are working through. Families use the separate parent route where a student shares access.

Not included by default

A school pilot does not create a public student profile, a parent paywall, or a leaderboard using identifiable school data.

Product system

Built around the audience buying or using it

Every Vector planet now has a defined buyer, primary user, system job, privacy scope and first workflow. That keeps the product roadmap and public marketing tied to what the platform can actually support.

Teachers managing classes, homework and intervention

School dashboards should show the minimum student-level detail needed for role-based teaching and intervention.

First workflows

1Create or join a school workspace
2Add classes and assign homework
3Review cohort weakness and completion signals

Guardrails before scale

Role-based access for school staff

Procurement, privacy and safeguarding review before wider rollout

No public-sector endorsement claim

No trust-wide analytics before school-level access rules are defined

No unsupported public-sector approval wording

Account and data architecture

The public page is not a data dashboard. It explains the intended architecture: shared account identity, shared learning profile and permissioned insights across the StudyVector constellation.

Vector Schools is designed to sit on top of StudyVector's topic mastery and question-attempt data.

School views should show appropriate cohort insight without exposing more student data than staff need.

Support notes and safeguarding-aware records must stay permissioned and auditable.

Compliance readiness

School procurement and safeguarding readiness

Vector Schools is written for school review: privacy, safeguarding, IT standards and procurement evidence are explicit before any wider cohort rollout.

Reviewed against public guidance

Source set reviewed 22 May 2026. This is a product-readiness framework, not legal advice and not a claim of DfE, exam-board, Ofqual, UCAS, university or school approval.

Least-privilege dashboards

School views should show cohort and intervention insight without exposing more student-level data than staff need for their role.

School-led approval

StudyVector can provide review material, but each school, trust or college still makes its own DPO, safeguarding and procurement decision.

No public-sector endorsement claim

Copy can reference official guidance used for design review, but must not imply DfE, Ofqual or exam-board approval.

Evidence expected before wider rollout

These records keep product, procurement and partnership conversations inspectable before school, exam-board or university discussions move further.

DPA, DPIA summary and retention notes available for school review before a wider rollout.

Subprocessor, data-location and model-training positions linked from the legal and security pages.

Clear notes on what is live, early access or planned before procurement conversations start.

Named school contact and escalation route agreed before any school pilot uses student personal data.

DfEAI and data protection in schools DfEKeeping children safe in education DfEDigital and technology standards DfECyber security core standard ICOData protection impact assessments

Request a free school trial or scoped follow-up

Tell us your role, school, approximate cohort, and what you want to improve. We reply with the most useful next step for your context: a suggested pilot route, licence guidance, or a short demo if that will move things faster.

• Best for HoDs, SLT, trust leads, heads of year, and tuition-centre managers
• We can reply with pilot structure, subject fit, and likely next steps
• No student personal data is needed at this stage

Next step

What happens after you send this

We treat this as a trial-scoping form, not a generic sales inbox.

• Reply from schools@studyvector.co.uk
• Suggested next step: overview, demo, or pilot scoping
• Confirmation of current fit for your boards, subjects, and cohort
• Reminder of what materials can be reviewed before rollout

Procurement review

Review materials before a wider conversation

Your team can review the public security, privacy, DPA, subprocessor, and exam-board alignment pages before sharing details internally. The form also lets you flag what a DPO, SLT, trust lead, or procurement colleague needs first.

School evidence overview School overview PDF Teacher workflow guide Security overview Student privacy Exam-board alignment Content-quality corrections School DPA Subprocessors Organisation review route

These are review materials, not external approval, certification, or exam-board endorsement.

Internal routing

Who to involve before a pilot

Use these routes to send the right evidence to the right person before a wider call. No student personal data is needed for this internal review.

DPO or data lead

Privacy, retention, subprocessor and DPA / DPIA materials.

HoD or intervention lead

30-day pilot question, priority subjects, boards and weak-topic review signals.

SLT or trust lead

Evidence overview, pilot review rubric and rollout decision boundaries.

IT or MIS owner

Current manual setup, planned SSO / MIS status and access boundaries.

Curriculum or exam-board alignment reviewer

Source alignment, independence wording and content-correction route.

Need something simpler to circulate internally first? Download school overview.

School enquiry

Share the basics and we will suggest the right next step

Use the form if you want a serious reply for your school context rather than a generic sales follow-up.

Name

Role

School / centre name

Work email

Approx. student count

Priority subjects / year groups

Exam boards or specifications

Main pilot goal

Review materials needed

Optional: tick anything your school wants to see before a demo or pilot. Planned items are clearly labelled in follow-up rather than presented as live.

Intervention workflow and pilot routePilot review rubric and success signalsTeacher reporting and data viewsHomework and marking workloadPrivacy, security, and subprocessorsDPA / DPIA materialsExam-board alignment and independenceResponsible AI and safeguarding boundariesSSO / MIS status

Selected review focus

Not sure what to pick? Leave this blank and we will send the core school evidence pack first.

We use this to route the reply to the right evidence pack, not to ask for student personal data.

What are you hoping to improve?

Spam protection by Cloudflare Turnstile.

Replies come from schools@studyvector.co.uk. We do not need student personal data until a rollout route is agreed.

We only use these details to follow up about StudyVector for your organisation. Do not include student personal data in this form.

Security and privacy practice

Built for teacher trust and exam-board scrutiny

StudyVector’s school and teacher ecosystem is marketed around reviewable controls: privacy boundaries, human-reviewed marking, assessment-integrity wording and evidence packs that schools can inspect before rollout.

Reviewed source posture

Source set reviewed 22 May 2026. Designed against public DfE, ICO, Ofqual and JCQ guidance. This does not imply approval, certification or endorsement by those bodies.

Teacher-facing AI first

AI support is framed around reducing teacher workload: draft marking, lesson prep and follow-up suggestions. Feedback that affects a learner stays reviewable by a teacher or authorised adult.

Human review before final feedback

Personal data minimisation

School review materials prioritise collecting only the data needed for the workflow, keeping sensitive support notes permissioned and making privacy notices, DPA and retention evidence easy to find.

DPA, DPIA and retention links

Assessment integrity boundaries

MarkVector and teacher workflows avoid presenting AI as an official marker. Practice feedback is separate from regulated assessment decisions and school or awarding-body rules remain the source of truth.

No AI-as-sole-marker claim

Claim control for partnerships

Exam-board, DfE, Ofqual, UCAS and university names are treated as protected claim areas. Public copy can cite guidance, but approval or partnership language requires written proof and approved wording.

No endorsement by default

Public guidance used for review materials

These references help teachers, DPOs, SLT and exam-board contacts understand the boundaries we are building toward.

DfEAI and data protection in schools DfEGenerative AI in education DfECyber security core standard OfqualAI malpractice and assessment advice note JCQAI use in assessments ICOData protection impact assessments

Shared data, clear boundaries

Future Vector products are designed to sync through controlled StudyVector learning data: user profiles, mastery, mistakes, marking feedback and dashboard views. Public pages never expose private learner data.

Product onboarding intent

Supabase user profile

Shared mastery data

Error log

Marking feedback

Topic weakness data

Teacher, tutor and school dashboards

Related Vector products

The ecosystem is designed to share learning context while keeping each workflow clear.

Explore all products

Live

StudyVector

Students and families

Board-aware revision practice for GCSE, A-Level and beyond.

Learn more

Early access

MarkVector

Teachers, tutors and students

AI drafts the feedback. Teachers stay in control.

Learn more

Early access

TutorVector

Independent tutors and tutoring teams

The AI workspace for modern tutors.

Learn more

Help shape the product

Vector Schools is part of the wider Vector roadmap. Early conversations help keep the product useful, honest and connected to real learning workflows.

Request a free school trial Download schools overview

Set up inside StudyVector onboarding

Who can see what during a school pilot

School access should help staff intervene without turning student practice into an open dossier. We scope staff roles, pilot groups, and review needs before student personal data is shared.

Any wider rollout should confirm staff roles, retention expectations, escalation contacts, and whether student-level views are needed for the agreed intervention question.

Built around the audience buying or using it

Teachers managing classes, homework and intervention

School dashboards should show the minimum student-level detail needed for role-based teaching and intervention.

School procurement and safeguarding readiness

Vector Schools is written for school review: privacy, safeguarding, IT standards and procurement evidence are explicit before any wider cohort rollout.

Reviewed against public guidance

Source set reviewed 22 May 2026. This is a product-readiness framework, not legal advice and not a claim of DfE, exam-board, Ofqual, UCAS, university or school approval.

Request a free school trial or scoped follow-up

• Best for HoDs, SLT, trust leads, heads of year, and tuition-centre managers

• We can reply with pilot structure, subject fit, and likely next steps

• No student personal data is needed at this stage

Next step

What happens after you send this

We treat this as a trial-scoping form, not a generic sales inbox.

• Reply from schools@studyvector.co.uk
• Suggested next step: overview, demo, or pilot scoping
• Confirmation of current fit for your boards, subjects, and cohort
• Reminder of what materials can be reviewed before rollout

Procurement review

Review materials before a wider conversation

These are review materials, not external approval, certification, or exam-board endorsement.

Internal routing

Who to involve before a pilot

Use these routes to send the right evidence to the right person before a wider call. No student personal data is needed for this internal review.

DPO or data lead

Privacy, retention, subprocessor and DPA / DPIA materials.

HoD or intervention lead

30-day pilot question, priority subjects, boards and weak-topic review signals.

SLT or trust lead

Evidence overview, pilot review rubric and rollout decision boundaries.

IT or MIS owner

Current manual setup, planned SSO / MIS status and access boundaries.

Curriculum or exam-board alignment reviewer

Source alignment, independence wording and content-correction route.

Need something simpler to circulate internally first? Download school overview.

Built for teacher trust and exam-board scrutiny

Reviewed source posture

Source set reviewed 22 May 2026. Designed against public DfE, ICO, Ofqual and JCQ guidance. This does not imply approval, certification or endorsement by those bodies.