AI marking and feedback for teachers, tutors and students.
MarkVector is the Vector marking layer: AI-assisted draft marking, rubric feedback and examiner-style comments with human review before feedback is final.
This product sits under Vector Learning Technologies and uses StudyVector as the shared public platform, account path and learning context.
One learning intelligence system
Built as connected StudyVector products, not separate microsites.
One StudyVector account
One shared learning profile
Teacher, marking, school, safety and pathway planets connected to the same core
Product permissions stay under Vector Learning Technologies governance
Early-access workflow
The page is intentionally clear about status. Live, early-access and planned features are labelled so the ecosystem can grow without inventing traction or capability.
Paste question, rubric and student answer
AI drafts mark and feedback
Teacher or tutor reviews before finalising
Examiner-style comments
Common mistake detection
Exportable feedback
Future sync with the StudyVector Error Log
How the workflow connects
1
Paste the question, rubric and answer
2
Review the AI draft mark and feedback
3
Edit the final comment before sharing
4
Send useful mistakes back into the learner's StudyVector repair loop
StudyVector constellation
One account, one learning profile, multiple role-specific planets.
StudyVector, Core star: Student learning engine. Practice, homework, lessons, error log and Battle Mode. MarkVector, Marking planet: Teacher-reviewed feedback. Essay marker and practice auto-marking. TutorVector, Tutor planet: Lesson and tutor workspace. Tutor, lesson and homework helper routes. Vector Schools, School planet: Classes, homework and cohorts. Teacher dashboard, classes and homework. SafetyVector, Safety planet: Support records and SEND-aware context. Planned support-record layer. ComplianceVector, Compliance planet: Review evidence and policy records. Planned governance workspace. PathwayVector, Pathway planet: Degree, apprenticeship and career guidance. Planned pathway layer.
Every Vector planet now has a defined buyer, primary user, system job, privacy scope and first workflow. That keeps the product roadmap and public marketing tied to what the platform can actually support.
Teachers reviewing practice answers and written responses
Student answers used for draft marking should not become final marks until an authorised adult reviews the output.
First workflows
1Capture subject, board, question and rubric context
2Draft feedback with confidence and review flags
3Send reviewed mistake signals back to StudyVector
Guardrails before scale
Human review before final feedback
No official examiner or awarding-body claim
Assessment-integrity warning where work could be formally assessed
No sole-marker workflow for regulated assessment decisions
No awarding-body approval language without written proof
Account and data architecture
The public page is not a data dashboard. It explains the intended architecture: shared account identity, shared learning profile and permissioned insights across the StudyVector constellation.
The current StudyVector essay marker is the nearest live marking surface.
The wider rubric workflow is being prepared as an early-access teacher and tutor product.
Future feedback sync will connect marking comments with StudyVector weak-topic and error-log data.
Draft marking support is not official examiner feedback and is not a replacement for teacher judgement.
Compliance readiness
Teacher-reviewed marking boundaries
MarkVector is positioned as draft feedback support. It must not replace teacher judgement, centre policies, official mark schemes or exam-board decisions.
Reviewed against public guidance
Source set reviewed 22 May 2026. This is a product-readiness framework, not legal advice and not a claim of DfE, exam-board, Ofqual, UCAS, university or school approval.
Human review before final marks
AI output is treated as a draft. A teacher, tutor or authorised adult reviews marks and comments before they are shared as final feedback.
Assessment integrity
Assessed work follows school and JCQ rules. MarkVector copy avoids presenting AI help as allowed for every assessment context.
No official examiner claim
Rubric feedback can be examiner-style for practice, but it is not official examiner feedback and does not imply exam-board endorsement.
Evidence expected before wider rollout
These records keep product, procurement and partnership conversations inspectable before school, exam-board or university discussions move further.
DPA, DPIA summary and retention notes available for school review before a wider rollout.
Subprocessor, data-location and model-training positions linked from the legal and security pages.
Clear notes on what is live, early access or planned before procurement conversations start.
Named school contact and escalation route agreed before any school pilot uses student personal data.
Marking workflow notes showing where human review happens before feedback is finalised.
Assessment-integrity note for school and tutor use cases.
StudyVector’s school and teacher ecosystem is marketed around reviewable controls: privacy boundaries, human-reviewed marking, assessment-integrity wording and evidence packs that schools can inspect before rollout.
Reviewed source posture
Source set reviewed 22 May 2026. Designed against public DfE, ICO, Ofqual and JCQ guidance. This does not imply approval, certification or endorsement by those bodies.
Teacher-facing AI first
AI support is framed around reducing teacher workload: draft marking, lesson prep and follow-up suggestions. Feedback that affects a learner stays reviewable by a teacher or authorised adult.
Human review before final feedback
Personal data minimisation
School review materials prioritise collecting only the data needed for the workflow, keeping sensitive support notes permissioned and making privacy notices, DPA and retention evidence easy to find.
DPA, DPIA and retention links
Assessment integrity boundaries
MarkVector and teacher workflows avoid presenting AI as an official marker. Practice feedback is separate from regulated assessment decisions and school or awarding-body rules remain the source of truth.
No AI-as-sole-marker claim
Claim control for partnerships
Exam-board, DfE, Ofqual, UCAS and university names are treated as protected claim areas. Public copy can cite guidance, but approval or partnership language requires written proof and approved wording.
No endorsement by default
Public guidance used for review materials
These references help teachers, DPOs, SLT and exam-board contacts understand the boundaries we are building toward.
Future Vector products are designed to sync through controlled StudyVector learning data: user profiles, mastery, mistakes, marking feedback and dashboard views. Public pages never expose private learner data.
Product onboarding intent
Supabase user profile
Shared mastery data
Error log
Marking feedback
Topic weakness data
Teacher, tutor and school dashboards
Related Vector products
The ecosystem is designed to share learning context while keeping each workflow clear.