Legal
Accuracy and specification alignment
Last updated: March 2026. This page explains what we mean when we say our content is specification-aligned, how we reduce off-spec or misleading feedback, and what you can expect if something slips through.
What "spec-aligned" means
StudyVector maps questions, explanations and AI tutoring prompts to published exam board specifications for the academic year (including 2026 exam series). We prioritise board-true command words, mark-style structure and topic coverage that matches what students are assessed on.
Expert verification
Content is reviewed and refined using subject expertise — including mathematics work checked against strong university-level rigour and admissions-style reasoning patterns informed by high-performing UCAT preparation practice. Pedagogy is also reviewed with UK secondary school teachers. This does not replace your school's scheme of work; it complements it with exam-shaped practice.
AI feedback and "zero hallucination"
Our AI tools are constrained to examiner-style marking schemes and specification boundaries. No model is perfect: if feedback ever drifts off-spec, we treat that as a defect. We continuously cross-check outputs against AQA, OCR, Edexcel and other supported boards for the relevant series.
Double the accuracy guarantee (marketing)
Where we compare our positioning to other revision apps, we refer to our focus on board-specific accuracy and remediation — not a cash guarantee unless explicitly offered in a separate written offer. If you find content that is clearly wrong for your board or year, contact us with the question or topic reference and we will prioritise a fix or credit in line with our fair-use policy for paying customers.
Contact
Questions about this policy: use the contact page.