ComplianceVector is planned — not live in StudyVector yet
Register interest below. For live sixth-form and admissions support today, use StudyVector practice, the admissions hub, and parent visibility — not this page as a finished product.
Responsible AI, policy and procurement records for education teams.
ComplianceVector is the planned compliance workspace for schools and learning providers that need clear records for AI use, data protection reviews, procurement notes and product governance.
School leaders, data protection leads and learning providers
Built inside StudyVector
This product sits under Vector Learning Technologies and uses StudyVector as the shared public platform, account path and learning context.
One learning intelligence system
Built as connected StudyVector products, not separate microsites.
One StudyVector account
One shared learning profile
Teacher, marking, school, safety and pathway planets connected to the same core
Product permissions stay under Vector Learning Technologies governance
Planned product direction
The page is intentionally clear about status. Live, early-access and planned features are labelled so the ecosystem can grow without inventing traction or capability.
AI-use policy records
DPIA and procurement evidence notes
Subprocessor and retention checklists
School trial governance records
Responsible AI review logs
Exportable compliance summaries
How the workflow connects
1
Record the organisation's StudyVector use case
2
Keep procurement, privacy and responsible AI notes together
3
Attach evidence links and review status
4
Export a clear summary for authorised school or provider reviews
StudyVector constellation
One account, one learning profile, multiple role-specific planets.
StudyVector, Core star: Student learning engine. Practice, homework, lessons, error log and Battle Mode. MarkVector, Marking planet: Teacher-reviewed feedback. Essay marker and practice auto-marking. TutorVector, Tutor planet: Lesson and tutor workspace. Tutor, lesson and homework helper routes. Vector Schools, School planet: Classes, homework and cohorts. Teacher dashboard, classes and homework. SafetyVector, Safety planet: Support records and SEND-aware context. Planned support-record layer. ComplianceVector, Compliance planet: Review evidence and policy records. Planned governance workspace. PathwayVector, Pathway planet: Degree, apprenticeship and career guidance. Planned pathway layer.
Every Vector planet now has a defined buyer, primary user, system job, privacy scope and first workflow. That keeps the product roadmap and public marketing tied to what the platform can actually support.
School and provider teams reviewing AI, privacy and procurement evidence
Governance records should store review status and evidence links, not private student answers or sensitive support notes.
First workflows
1Record the organisation's StudyVector use case
2Attach source links, review owner and next review date
3Export a clear summary for authorised review
Guardrails before scale
Evidence over badges
Guidance links stay visible beside internal records
DfE, Ofqual, UCAS, university and exam-board claims require written proof
No public compliance badge
No approval or certification wording from public bodies
Account and data architecture
The public page is not a data dashboard. It explains the intended architecture: shared account identity, shared learning profile and permissioned insights across the StudyVector constellation.
ComplianceVector is planned as an internal governance layer, not a public compliance badge.
It should cite StudyVector legal, security and privacy pages instead of making unsupported certification claims.
School and provider records will require controlled access and review before anything is shared externally.
Compliance readiness
Governance records, not compliance badges
ComplianceVector is planned as a workspace for evidence, review ownership and policy notes. It should make review easier without pretending to certify StudyVector or a school.
Reviewed against public guidance
Source set reviewed 22 May 2026. This is a product-readiness framework, not legal advice and not a claim of DfE, exam-board, Ofqual, UCAS, university or school approval.
Evidence over badges
The product records documents, decisions, owners and review dates. It does not create public approval marks or certification claims.
Guidance stays cited
Official guidance links sit beside internal evidence so schools can check the source rather than relying on marketing wording.
Partnership claims require proof
External affiliation, approval or partnership wording stays blocked unless there is written evidence and approved wording.
Evidence expected before wider rollout
These records keep product, procurement and partnership conversations inspectable before school, exam-board or university discussions move further.
DPA, DPIA summary and retention notes available for school review before a wider rollout.
Subprocessor, data-location and model-training positions linked from the legal and security pages.
Clear notes on what is live, early access or planned before procurement conversations start.
Named school contact and escalation route agreed before any school pilot uses student personal data.
Policy owner, review date and source-link fields for each governance record.
Claim-control checklist for official-body, provider, admissions and public-sector wording.
StudyVector’s school and teacher ecosystem is marketed around reviewable controls: privacy boundaries, human-reviewed marking, assessment-integrity wording and evidence packs that schools can inspect before rollout.
Reviewed source posture
Source set reviewed 22 May 2026. Designed against public DfE, ICO, Ofqual and JCQ guidance. This does not imply approval, certification or endorsement by those bodies.
Teacher-facing AI first
AI support is framed around reducing teacher workload: draft marking, lesson prep and follow-up suggestions. Feedback that affects a learner stays reviewable by a teacher or authorised adult.
Human review before final feedback
Personal data minimisation
School review materials prioritise collecting only the data needed for the workflow, keeping sensitive support notes permissioned and making privacy notices, DPA and retention evidence easy to find.
DPA, DPIA and retention links
Assessment integrity boundaries
MarkVector and teacher workflows avoid presenting AI as an official marker. Practice feedback is separate from regulated assessment decisions and school or awarding-body rules remain the source of truth.
No AI-as-sole-marker claim
Claim control for partnerships
Exam-board, DfE, Ofqual, UCAS and university names are treated as protected claim areas. Public copy can cite guidance, but approval or partnership language requires written proof and approved wording.
No endorsement by default
Public guidance used for review materials
These references help teachers, DPOs, SLT and exam-board contacts understand the boundaries we are building toward.
Future Vector products are designed to sync through controlled StudyVector learning data: user profiles, mastery, mistakes, marking feedback and dashboard views. Public pages never expose private learner data.
Product onboarding intent
Supabase user profile
Shared mastery data
Error log
Marking feedback
Topic weakness data
Teacher, tutor and school dashboards
Related Vector products
The ecosystem is designed to share learning context while keeping each workflow clear.
ComplianceVector is part of the wider Vector roadmap. Early conversations help keep the product useful, honest and connected to real learning workflows.