Procurement-ready notes
Schools and MATs
Use one evidence pack for AI use, privacy, retention, procurement notes and trial scope before a cohort rollout.
ComplianceVector is planned — not live in StudyVector yet
Register interest below. For live sixth-form and admissions support today, use StudyVector practice, the admissions hub, and parent visibility — not this page as a finished product.
PlannedStudyVector constellation
ComplianceVector
Responsible AI, policy and procurement records for education teams.
ComplianceVector is the planned compliance workspace for schools, learning providers and awarding-organisation conversations that need clear records for AI use, data protection reviews, procurement notes and product governance.
School leaders, data protection leads, learning providers and awarding-organisation contacts
Built inside StudyVector
This product sits under Vector Learning Technologies and uses StudyVector as the shared public platform, account path and learning context.
One learning intelligence system
Built as connected StudyVector products, not separate microsites.
One StudyVector account
One shared learning profile
Teacher, marking, school, safety and pathway planets connected to the same core
Product permissions stay under Vector Learning Technologies governance
Planned product direction
The page is intentionally clear about status. Live, early-access and planned features are labelled so the ecosystem can grow without inventing traction or capability.
AI-use policy records
DPIA and procurement evidence notes
Subprocessor and retention checklists
School trial governance records
Responsible AI review logs
Exportable compliance summaries
Claim-control notes for awarding-body wording
How the workflow connects
1
Record the organisation's StudyVector use case
2
Keep procurement, privacy and responsible AI notes together
3
Attach evidence links and review status
4
Export a clear summary for authorised school, provider or awarding-body reviews
StudyVector constellation
One account, one learning profile, multiple role-specific planets.
StudyVectorStudent learning engineMarkVectorTeacher-reviewed feedbackTutorVectorLesson and tutor workspaceVector SchoolsClasses, homework and cohortsSafetyVectorSupport records and SEND-aware contextComplianceVectorReview evidence and policy recordsPathwayVectorDegree, apprenticeship and career guidance
Product system
Built around the audience buying or using it
Every Vector planet now has a defined buyer, primary user, system job, privacy scope and first workflow. That keeps the product roadmap and public marketing tied to what the platform can actually support.
School, provider and awarding-body teams reviewing AI, privacy and procurement evidence
Governance records should store review status and evidence links, not private student answers or sensitive support notes.
First workflows
- 1Record the organisation's StudyVector use case
- 2Attach source links, review owner and next review date
- 3Export a clear summary for authorised school, provider or awarding-body review
Guardrails before scale
Evidence over badges
Guidance links stay visible beside internal records
DfE, Ofqual, UCAS, university and exam-board claims require written proof
No public compliance badge
No approval or certification wording from public bodies
Account and data architecture
The public page is not a data dashboard. It explains the intended architecture: shared account identity, shared learning profile and permissioned insights across the StudyVector constellation.
ComplianceVector is planned as an internal governance layer, not a public compliance badge.
It should cite StudyVector legal, security and privacy pages instead of making unsupported certification claims.
School, provider and awarding-body review records will require controlled access before anything is shared externally.
Compliance readiness
Governance records, not compliance badges
ComplianceVector is planned as a workspace for evidence, review ownership and policy notes. It should make review easier without pretending to certify StudyVector or a school.
Reviewed against public guidance
Source set reviewed 22 May 2026. This is a product-readiness framework, not legal advice and not a claim of DfE, exam-board, Ofqual, UCAS, university or school approval.
Evidence over badges
The product records documents, decisions, owners and review dates. It does not create public approval marks or certification claims.
Guidance stays cited
Official guidance links sit beside internal evidence so schools can check the source rather than relying on marketing wording.
Partnership claims require proof
External affiliation, approval or partnership wording stays blocked unless there is written evidence and approved wording.
Evidence expected before wider rollout
These records keep product, procurement and partnership conversations inspectable before school, exam-board or university discussions move further.
DPA, DPIA summary and retention notes available for school review before a wider rollout.
Subprocessor, data-location and model-training positions linked from the legal and security pages.
Clear notes on what is live, early access or planned before procurement conversations start.
Named school contact and escalation route agreed before any school pilot uses student personal data.
Policy owner, review date and source-link fields for each governance record.
Claim-control checklist for official-body, provider, admissions and public-sector wording.
Organisation review route
A practical review route for education teams
StudyVector wants serious education organisations to inspect the evidence before making a decision. This section keeps those conversations practical: what can be reviewed, what cannot be claimed, and who owns the next check.
This is a review route, not an endorsement route. Any future affiliation or official-body wording would need written evidence and exact agreed wording before it appears publicly.
Read organisation review guideA direct review map for schools, trusts, tutoring providers, procurement teams, exam boards and awarding organisations.Request a review conversationFor schools, providers, trusts or awarding-body contacts who need a structured evidence discussion.Request TutorVector provider reviewFor tutoring organisations or learning providers checking role boundaries, parent summaries and learner-data scope before rollout.Review exam-board alignmentFor awarding organisations or exam-board contacts checking route evidence, non-affiliation wording, correction outcomes and public-source boundaries.Download school evidence overviewOne-page PDF covering intervention fit, staff visibility, procurement and data materials, and current boundaries.Read school evidence overviewAccessible HTML version of the evidence overview for crawlers, screen readers and internal review links.Read TutorVector provider boundariesPermission, parent-summary and learner-data boundaries for tutoring organisations or providers reviewing TutorVector.Read security postureReview infrastructure, privacy, subprocessors and school-scale security notes before sharing student data.Read student privacyCheck how StudyVector explains learner data, parent visibility and under-18 boundaries.Read accuracy policyInspect how StudyVector labels source use, AI limits, non-affiliation and review status.
Provider review
Tutoring organisations
Keep tutor access, parent summaries, homework records and learner data boundaries in one review trail.
No endorsement implied
Awarding bodies and exam-board contacts
Separate descriptive syllabus alignment from any affiliation claim, and keep source links, wording owners and review dates visible.
Review evidence checklist
What StudyVector can share: source-link lists, spec-mapping notes, AI-use boundaries, privacy notes and current live-versus-planned status.
What StudyVector will not claim: official marking status, exam-board affiliation, public-sector approval, guaranteed outcomes or unpublished paper access.
What a reviewer should check: source wording, question-quality process, model-training position, data retention and who owns the next review date.
Security and privacy practice
Built for teacher trust and exam-board scrutiny
StudyVector’s school and teacher ecosystem is marketed around reviewable controls: privacy boundaries, human-reviewed marking, assessment-integrity wording and evidence packs that schools can inspect before rollout.
Reviewed source posture
Source set reviewed 22 May 2026. Designed against public DfE, ICO, Ofqual and JCQ guidance. This does not imply approval, certification or endorsement by those bodies.
Teacher-facing AI first
AI support is framed around reducing teacher workload: draft marking, lesson prep and follow-up suggestions. Feedback that affects a learner stays reviewable by a teacher or authorised adult.
Human review before final feedback
Personal data minimisation
School review materials prioritise collecting only the data needed for the workflow, keeping sensitive support notes permissioned and making privacy notices, DPA and retention evidence easy to find.
DPA, DPIA and retention links
Assessment integrity boundaries
MarkVector and teacher workflows avoid presenting AI as an official marker. Practice feedback is separate from regulated assessment decisions and school or awarding-body rules remain the source of truth.
No AI-as-sole-marker claim
Claim control for partnerships
Exam-board, DfE, Ofqual, UCAS and university names are treated as protected claim areas. Public copy can cite guidance, but approval or partnership language requires written proof and approved wording.
No endorsement by default
Public guidance used for review materials
These references help teachers, DPOs, SLT and exam-board contacts understand the boundaries we are building toward.
Shared data, clear boundaries
Future Vector products are designed to sync through controlled StudyVector learning data: user profiles, mastery, mistakes, marking feedback and dashboard views. Public pages never expose private learner data.
Product onboarding intent
Supabase user profile
Shared mastery data
Error log
Marking feedback
Topic weakness data
Teacher, tutor and school dashboards
Related Vector products
The ecosystem is designed to share learning context while keeping each workflow clear.
Live
StudyVector
Students and families
Board-aware revision practice for GCSE, A-Level and beyond.
Early access
MarkVector
Teachers, tutors and students
AI drafts the feedback. Teachers stay in control.
Early access
TutorVector
Independent tutors and tutoring teams
The AI workspace for modern tutors.
Help shape the product
ComplianceVector is part of the wider Vector roadmap. Early conversations help keep the product useful, honest and connected to real learning workflows.